Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About this Blog

Journal Blog Central is the home for the North-East's best bloggers, writing on everything from newsroom life to ethical living, cookery, TV reviews and birdwatching.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Sponsored links

Blog Authors

Archives

More Blog Links

Sponsored links


Journalists, bad habits and tiny tots

Posted by Graeme on January 3, 2008 2:17 PM | 

Journalists have many bad habits, but the one in particular that often makes me cringe is our use of an odd language that no-one else in the world can speak.

We mostly write in English, of course, but occassionally reporters lapse into a strange lingo that I can only call "journalese", a strange collection of words that only ever appear in newspapers.

Who, for example, ever uses the word "slam" to mean criticism, except for journalists? (As in "A council was slammed for xxxxxx" or "A distraught mother last night slammed social services for xxxxxx")

A lot of these words start getting used because they're snappy and they fit in headlines, but it seems to me that they're nonsense.

The one that particular irks me is "tot". Tabloid newspapers are very keen on the word - which seems to describe any child of pre-school age - but I've never heard anyone in real life say: "Oh, what a nice tot you have", or "How is your tot these days?"

Over 2008, I thought I'd compile the first ever English-journalese dictionary so if you see any examples of it in the press, please let me know.

TrackBack

TrackBack<$MTEntryTrackbackLink$>>

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference <$MTEntryTitle$>:

">

» <$MTPingTitle$> from <$MTPingBlogName$>
<$MTPingExcerpt$> [Read More]

Tracked on <$MTPingDate$>

Comments (14)

James wrote...

'Ace' as in 'soccer ace' - meaning 'football player.

'Snapper' instead of 'photographer'.

'Op' as in 'hospital operation'.

Posted by: James  | January 9, 2008 10:45 AM

Dave Lee wrote...

Wonderful idea ... my personal favourite is 'quizzed' when used in a serious context. "CBBC presenter in murder quiz" was one I heard the other day. Sounds like they sat him down in a village pub and offered multiple choice.

Problem is, all journalists know that these words don't make a great deal of sense. But what they DO do is fit into headlines. 'Tot' instead of child, 'quiz' instead of questioning. So as long as newspapers remain, so will the dodgy words.

Posted by: Dave Lee  | January 9, 2008 11:32 AM

Anonymous wrote...

Great idea.

I'd like to put forward my personal favourites of:

Bogus (as in pensioners swindled by bogus official) and bungle (as in council bungle leaves family homeless).

Posted by: Anonymous  | January 9, 2008 12:48 PM

Alex wrote...

My personal favourites:

Daubed - as in graffiti
Caged - as in jailed
Downed - as in a drink driver who "downed" eight pints
Nightspots - pubs, nightclubs etc
Revellers - people in pubs, nightclubs etc

Posted by: Alex  | January 9, 2008 12:57 PM

Mike Dodd wrote...

One pet hate: Stories which say: A man who was accused of murder had the charge against him dropped today...
No he did not - the charge might have been dropped, but he did not have it done, as whatever was done was done by others.

Posted by: Mike Dodd  | January 10, 2008 10:04 AM

Katy Gordon wrote...

This is awesome, I have a few to add myself.

Blasted (A Glasgow man blasted the council...)

Not a word but a phrase:
"Took to their heels" (Did a runner)

There are tons more, but I just can't think of them now

Posted by: Katy Gordon  | January 10, 2008 12:11 PM

Chris wrote...

Politicians of all hues (colours)

If asked what your favourite colour is, would you say: "My favourite hue is....?

Posted by: Chris  | January 10, 2008 2:28 PM

Anonymous wrote...

'beleagured' - organisation/person in trouble

'boost' - e.g. 'cash boost' instead of donation

Posted by: Anonymous  | January 11, 2008 5:09 PM

Jules wrote...

axed - to be fired
high jinks - messing about
notched - registered

Posted by: Jules  | January 14, 2008 2:50 PM

Martin wrote...

My personal (least) favourite is "fury" — especially headlines that begin "fury over", when the only apparent fury in the story is the journalist's.

Posted by: Martin  | January 15, 2008 9:43 AM

famaf wrote...

Quality!

How about "chiefs"?
As in "Council chiefs say...." or "Hospital chiefs deny funding black hole"

Does anybody ever actually refer to someone as a chief in real life?

Posted by: famaf  | January 16, 2008 4:20 PM

Ian wrote...

Drub - as in Liverpool's 5-0 drubbing of Luton rights ship

Posted by: Ian  | January 16, 2008 5:34 PM

rob wrote...

Scoffed - as in ate

Caged - as in jailed

Scooped - as in "scooped" an award

Guzzled - as in drank

Thronged - as is crowds thronged the streets

Youths - as in young people

Yobs - see above


Posted by: rob  | January 24, 2008 4:06 PM

Marc Wads wrote...

How about the use by the red tops of 'pal' for someone's friend? It's a word that would probably cause alarm in a bar if a stroppy drunk standing next to you blurted out: 'Look here, pal.'

Posted by: Marc Wads  | February 25, 2008 12:06 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)